Harpviken and Roislien
(2008:351) recognise that religion is an integral dimension within many armed
conflicts. The religion of Christianity is no exception to this. Like any other
religion, Christianity has been involved in instances of both peace and
violence throughout history.
In their essay,
Ehrenhaus and Owen (2007:276) reflect on the performance of ritual lynching
within the white Christian evangelical worldview that predominated among
members of the white supremacist community responsible for lynching
African-Americans. They state that, through a fusion of cultures with faith
centred on the violent death of Christ on the cross, this practice of lynching
can be read as a ritual re-enactment of blood sacrifice, or “propitiation for
the sin of blackness and expiation for the white supremacist community”
(Ehrenhaus & Own 2007: 276).
Between the 1880s and
1930s, Evangelicalism was the dominant religious perspective worldwide, serving
as a foundational pillar of a national white supremacist culture (Ehrenhaus
& Owen 2007: 278). It affirmed the primacy of emotion over intellect and
rationalism. Within this worldview, sacrificial lynching reaffirmed a sacred
covenant among the members of the white Christian community and between that
community and their God (Ehrenhaus & Owen 2007: 278). Especially for white
Southern Evangelicals, that covenantal social order had been violated by the Reconstruction
Era, by the federally mandated intrusion of blackness into the now defiled
sacred public space of the white community (Ehrenhaus & Owen 2007: 278).
This commonly resulted in sadistic torture and the burning (often alive) of victims.
According to Ehrenhaus & Owen (2007: 281), “by lynching African Americans
accused of breaching social boundaries, the white community produced and
reproduced the sacrificial act of blood sacrifice that was at the centre of
their faith.”
Salvation from sin is
the central tenet of Evangelical faith (Ehrenhaus & Own 2007: 1278). As
Christ was sacrificed for humanity’s salvation, Evangelical adherents concurrently
believe sacrifice, as a symbol of torture and death, is at the heart of
salvation. This logic permeated the moral susceptibilities of the white
community and served as a legitimating rationale for a culture of violence
(Ehrenhaus & Own 2007: 278). How could such obscene acts of human immortality
take place in what were understood to be the most devoutly Christian portions
of the nation? How could these adherents engage in these unimaginable communal
acts of brutality that were so clearly un-Christian?
The explanation for
such bloodletting is not found in a retreat from Christian doctrine and
scripture, but in its embrace. Public ritual lynching was a performative
affirmation of fundamentalist Christian faith in a white supremacist national
community (Ehrenhaus & Own 2007: 277). It functioned, for the dominant
white Christian community, as acts of devotion, as blood sacrifices to a God
whose covenant with the white Christian community had been “violated by the
intrusion of blackness” into the sacred spaces of that covenant (Ehrenhaus
& Own 2007: 277).
It is interesting to
think that this religion, being Christianity, can be responsible for both sides
of this war. Whilst Evangelicalism followers see the religion as a source of
violence and an explanation for the violent sacrifice of black people, the
African American community used the faith as a source of endurance and
resistance (Ehrenhaus & Own 2007: 280). Additionally, other religious
institutions and white ministers expressed their collective opposition to
lynching by drawing upon scripture, the same scripture that began the violent
acts in the first place (Ehrenhaus & Own 2007: 280). So, this occurrence perfectly
exemplifies that religions have been involved in both violent and peaceful acts
throughout history. Religious adherents can take scripture out of context to
commend violence, or read it in its entirety and act towards peace and justice.
References
Ehrenhaus, P. & A.
Owen. (2004). Race Lynching and Christian Evangelism: Performances of Faith. Text and Performance Quarterly 24(3/4):
276-301.
Harpviken, K. & H.
Roislien. (2008). Faithful Brokers? Potentials and Pitfalls of Religion in
Peacemaking. Conflict Resolution
Quarterly 25(3): 351-373.
No comments:
Post a Comment